As a teacher, one of my main goals is to reach every one of my students. I try to make sure I connect with each student everyday (I might ask them about a game they like or how recess was or even how they are feeling).
In Kindergarten, this is an easy task that doesn't ever get taken out of hand. The students might pry into my life, but I can easily distract them, to help maintain the distance needed for the continuation of our teacher/student relationship. They ask similar questions though, and are always wondering about my family (something very concrete in their lives).
But where do I draw the line on what I know about their personal lives. Again, they are only 5, so they won't be telling me about getting pregnant or how they were grounded for smoking weed (or at least I hope that will never be the cast). But I do know a lot about their home lives. I know that some of them don't have enough food for dinner every night. I know that Dad was arrested because of spousal abuse. I know that they are homeless. I know that they don't have a father (and I know they are from in vitro fertilization), but they don't know that. I know about adoptions, divorces, new baby siblings, etc. But how much do I let that play in my interactions with the students.
To quote myself from the comment for the blog above:
"This year I have a student who is homeless. She also is an ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) Student – being ESOL she’s allowed x amount of mistakes, but how many more do I give her because I know she’s homeless? Grant it, she is a well behaved girl who LOVES coming to school and LOVES learning, so there aren’t many “problems” to be had; but yes, I do find myself being a more lenient on her."
Now, for my student with special needs, he too gets these "special" arrangements, but he's allowed them by law. So why do I give it to the child who is homeless?
Again, I turn to my own quote, "[I] want the rules to be fair and apply to everyone, but [I] want to give all our students equal opportunities to succeed (even if [I] have to fudge the rules to make up for the missed opportunities life has took away from them, even at the age of 5)."
I want them all to succeed and if that mean liberally applying rules and policies, I'll do it. This isn't the cold world yet, where most people don't give a damn about your disadvantages. Here I do get to codify them and help them succeed. This is what Affirmitive Action is about. And this is how it affects Kindergarteners. Does that mean the other students are aware of this "leg-up" some students get so they have equal access to the lessons and school? Of course not. The rules still apply to all students in the class, but some have amended rules that are used to better their grasp of the social and academic curriculum that I am trying to teach.

